Constraints of Student Ready Programme in State Agricultural Universities

CH. Arundhathi *

Agricultural Extension, MJPTBCWREIS, Agricultural College, Karimnagar, Telangana, India.

S. Ganesamoorthi

Department of Agricultural Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Y. N. Shivalingaiah

Department of Agricultural Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

H. S. Latha

Department of Agronomy, AICRP on Dry Land Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

T. L. Mohan Kumar

Department of Statistics, Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


The study was conducted in state agricultural universities of Karnataka, Telangana, Tamil Nadu and Kerala states during 2021-2022 to analyze the problems faced by undergraduate agricultural students undergone student READY programme.  Rural Agricultural Work Experience (RAWE), Agro-Industrial Attachment (AIA), Experiential Learning/Hands on Training, Project Reports are the components offered in the selected universities as a part of student READY programme. A total of 160 respondents (40 per university) were selected by using simple random sampling. Mailed questionnaires were used to collect data and appropriate statistical tools i.e. frequency and percentage were applied to analyze the data. The major constraints faced by students are lack of proper accommodation in RAWE villages, lack of transport facilities in RAWE villages, lack of farmer cooperation, inadequate stipend to meet the basic needs and lacking practical exposure during online classes. This research will help to modify the components that offered under student READY programme.

Keywords: Constraints, student READY programme, state agricultural universities, students

How to Cite

Arundhathi , C., Ganesamoorthi , S., Shivalingaiah, Y. N., Latha , H. S., & Kumar, T. L. M. (2024). Constraints of Student Ready Programme in State Agricultural Universities. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 30(5), 78–81.


Download data is not yet available.


Maruanaya RF, Karuna K, Tuhumena WA, Maruanaya GJT. Implementation of teaching factory to improve entrepreneurial competence of vocational high school students. Koli J. 2021;2(1):1-9.

Mawonedzo A, Tanga M, Luggya S, Nsubuga Y, Implementing strategies of entrepreneurship education in Zimbabwe. Education+ Training. 2020;63(1):85-100.

Okechukwu OT. Critical Factors Influencing the Entrepreneurial Undergraduate’s Decision Venturing into Agribusiness in Ebonyi State (A Case Study of Ebonyi State Universty). J. Nat. Sci. Res. 2014;4(19):33-38.

Sinnott E. An exploration of female undergraduates' attitudes towards and perceptions of entrepreneurship. Doctoral dissertation, Waterford Institute of Technology; 2008.

Anonymous, Student READY. Agricultural Education Division, ICAR, New Delhi; 2016. Accessed on: 2022 Available: ReadyBooklet_for%20web-1-25102016. pdf

CHIDI I. Critical factors influencing the entrepreneurial undergraduate's decision venturing into agribusiness in Ebonyi State (A case study of Ebonyi State University). J. Nat. Sci. Res.2014;4(19): 33-38.

Dnyandev SN. Entrepreneurial orientation of agriculture students. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis (Unpub.), MPKV, Rahuri, Maharashtra; 2019.

Emerole CO, Dorcas U, Kelechi C. Determinants of Entrepreneurship Decision for Agricultural Business among Graduates in Abia State, Nigeria. International Conference on Agricultural, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Phuket, Thailand; 2014.

Fatoki O, Chindoga L. An investigation into the obstacles to youth entrepreneurship in South Africa. J. Int. Bus. Res. 2011;4(2): 161-169.

Guerrero M, Urbano D, Gajón, E. Entrepreneurial university ecosystems and graduates' career patterns: Do entrepreneurship education programmes and university business incubators matter? Manag Dev. 2020;39(5):753-775.

Kozlinska I, Mets T, Rõigas K. Measuring learning outcomes of entrepreneurship education using structural equation modeling. Adm Sci. 2020;10(3):58.