Corporate Governance and Challenges of Financial Leverage of Privatised Cement Industry in Nigeria
Bappayo Masu Gombe *
Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Abuja, Nigeria.
Mustapha Mukhtar
Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The paper studies new corporate governance and the challenges of financial Leverage of privatised cement industry in Nigeria. The variables studied were leverage ratio as Performance proxy (dependent variables) and fourteen Corporate Governance proxies as independent variables. Data was collected from secondary sources, and the statistical tools employed in the Methodology were Trend Analysis and Pooled OLS regressions. Trend Analysis result suggests that;Devaluation, high cost of importation, insufficient power supply, bank strike, and deflation of global oil prices created capacity underutilization in cement industry and severe burden of financial leverage to sustain operational activities pre privatization. The result also, reveals that, the leverage ratio remarkably declined post privatization, however, the global financial crisis of 2009 inflicted high cost of production on the industry which necessitated increased leverage in order to cushion the effects on operational activities. Inferential Statistics Result suggests that corporate governance has positive and significant impact on the leverage ratio of the industry in general. The study concludes that, despite the challenges of unfavourable macroeconomic environment, the new corporate governance reduced the leverage ratio post privatisation and it has positive and significant impact on the financial leverage of the Cement Industry. The researcher recommends that Nigerian government should ensure favourable macroeconomic environment and improve private sector activities. Collectively, the new Corporate Governance of Cement Industry should strategize on how to; Increase Revenue, profitability, better management of inventory, and restructuring of debt to mitigate increased leverage.
Keywords: Corporate governance, financial leverage, privatization, cement industry
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Arocena P. The Reform of the utilities sector in Spain. WIDER Discussion paper 2001/13. Hetsuki: United Nation University/World Institute of Development Research; 2001.
Barja G, Mckenzie D, Urquiola M. Capilization and privatistion in Bolivia Manuscrpts. Cornel University, Ithaca, New York US; 2002.
Birdsall N, Nellis J. Winners and Loser; Assessing the Distribution Impact of Privetionzation. World Developmemt. 2003;1617-1633.
Boubakri N, Cosset JC, Guedham O. Post privatisation corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection. University Laval Quebec, Canada GIK 7 PA; 2002.
Boubakri N, Cosset JC. Does privatisation meet the expectations? Evidence from African countries, paper presented at the plenary on privatisation and corporate governance. African Economic Research Consortium, Biannual Research Workshop, Nairobi, Kenya, 4th – 6th December; 1999.
Megginson WL, Maria KB. The impact of privatisation on capital market development and individual share ownership, A Paper Presented at the Third FIBV Global Emerging Markets Conference and Exhibition, Federation of International Stock Exchanges, Istanbul, Turkey; 2000.
Megginson WL, Netter JM. From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature. 2001;39(2):321-389.
Megginson WL, Nash RC, Randenborgh MV. The financial and operational performance of newly privatised firms: An international empirical analysis. Journal of Finance. 1994;49:403 – 452.
Megginson WL, Nash RC, Netter JM, Annette BP. The choice of private versus public capital markets: evidence from privatisations. Contact Jetter on jnetter@terry.uga.edu; 2002.
Megginson WL, Nash RC, Netter JM, Schwartz AL. The Long-Run Effects to Investors in Share Issue Privatisations. Working Paper need to contact Adam Schwartz on email aschwart@exchange.sba.miami.edu; 1999.
Paredes R. Redistributive impact of privatisation and the regulation of utilities in Chile. WIDER Discussion paper No. 2001/19 Helsinki. United Nation University/World Institute of Development Research; 2001.
Yakovleu A. State-business relations and improvement of corporate governance in Russia joint paper of Japan-Russia research paper. Instiutute of Industrial and Market Studies State University Moscow; 2008.
Boubakri N, Cosset JC, Guedham O. Liberalisation, Corporate governance and the performance of newly privatised firms. Annual Conference Paper of Administrative Science Association of Canada; 2001.
Jerome A. Privatisation and enterprise performance in Nigeria: Case Study of some Privatized Enterprises; 2008.
Megginson WL. The economics of bank Privatisation, a paper presented at conference on bank privatisation in low and middle income countries, sponsored by finance division of the development research group, The World Bank; 2003.
Aljifri K, Moustafa M. The impact of corporate hovermance mechanism on the performance of Uae firms; an empirical analysis. Journal of Economics and Administrative Science. 2007;23(2): 71 – 93.
Boubakri N, Cosset JC. The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: evidence from developing countries. Journal of Finance. 1998;53.
Adeyemi SB, Fagbemi TO. Audit quality, corporate governance and firm characteristics in Nigeria; 2010.
Birdsall N, Nellis J. Winners and losers: Assessing the distributional impact of privatisation. Centre for Global Development Working Paper Number 6, May; 2002.
Ghani IW, Ashraf J. Corporate governance, business group affiliation and firm performance; descriptive evidence from Pakistan. CMER working paper series No. 105-35; 2005.
Badunenko O, Moritz FK, Dorathea S. Private equity, corporate governance and out performance of high-growth firms. Financial System, Efficiency, and Stimulate and Sustainable Growth, Working Paper FINSS D 32; 2010.
Jensen M, Meckling W. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency, cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 1976;3:305 – 360.
Coleman AK. Corporate governance and firm performance in Africa: A dynamic panel data analysis. International Conference on Corporate Governance of Emerging Markets. Global Corporate Governance Forum (GCGF); 2007.
Delfino JA, Casari AA. The reform of the utilities sector in Agentina, Un University WINDER, Discussion paper No. 2001/17; 2001.