Deciphering the Traits Association and Path Coefficient Analysis among Yield Attributing Traits of Snap Melon (Cucumis melo var. momordica) Genotypes

Shrilatha K A *

Department of Vegetable Science, College of Horticulture, UHS, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.

I. B. Biradar

College of Horticulture, Bagalkot, UHS, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.

Satish D

College of Horticulture, Bagalkot, UHS, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.

H. P. Hadimani

College of Horticulture, Bagalkot, UHS, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.

R. S. Jawadagi

College of Horticulture, Bagalkot, UHS, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.

Nayana K R

Department of Vegetable Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

An investigation was carried out at the University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, Karnataka, during the Rabi season of 2021. The experiment employed a randomized complete block design with two replications and aimed to assess twenty-five snap melon genotypes alongside three check varieties, sourced from various regions in India. Seventeen yield-related traits were observed for each genotype, and the mean data was utilized for subsequent analysis. The study on trait associations revealed that genotypic correlations exhibited higher values compared to their respective phenotypic counterparts, indicating stronger, consistent correlations independent of environmental factors. Notably, yield plant-1 exhibited positive and significant correlations with vine length, number of fruits vine-1, fruit weight, length of fruit, fruit circumference, and flesh thickness at both genotypic and phenotypic levels. Path coefficient analysis unveiled that the total number of fruits plant-1 and average fruit weight exerted positive direct effects on yield plant-1. Consequently, the study suggests that selection based on traits such as number of fruits-1 plant and average fruit weight would be effective for enhancing yield in snap melon.

Keywords: Cucumis melo, correlation coefficient, path analysis and snap melon, fruit weight, genotypic correlations, summer season crop


How to Cite

Shrilatha K A, Biradar, I. B., Satish D, Hadimani, H. P., Jawadagi, R. S., & Nayana K R. (2024). Deciphering the Traits Association and Path Coefficient Analysis among Yield Attributing Traits of Snap Melon (Cucumis melo var. momordica) Genotypes. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 30(6), 392–399. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i62054

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dhillon NPS, Ranjana R, Singh K, Eduardo I, Monforte, Pitrat AJ, et al. Diversity among landraces of Indian snapmelon (Cucumis melo var. momordica). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2007;54(6):1267-1283.

Hazara P, Chattopadhyay A, Karmakar K, Dutta S. Modern technology in vegetable production. New India Pub. Agency, New Delhi. 2011;413.

Kumar S, Kumar D, Kumar R, Thakur KS, Dogra BS. Estimation of genetic variability and divergence for fruit yield and quality traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in North-Western Himalayas. J. Plant Sci. 2013;1(2):27-36.

Wright S. Correlation and causation. J. Agri. Res. 1921;20: 557-580.

Al‐Jibouri HA, Miller PA and Robinson HF. Genotypic and environmental variances and covariances in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin 1. Agron. J. 1958;50(10):633-636.

Dewey DR, Lu K. A Correlation and path‐coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production 1. Agron. J. 1959;51(9):515-518.

Nadarajan N, Manivannan N, Gunasekaran M. Quantitative genetics and biometrical techniques in plant breeding. Kalyani Publishers. New Delhi. 2005;258

Said EM, Fatiha H. Genotypic variation in fruit characters in some genotypes of watermelon cultivated in Morocco. Int. J. Agron. Agric. Res. 2015;6:130-37

Babu RR, Rao NH and Reddy RVSK. Correlation and path analysis in oriental pickling melon (Cucumis melo L. var. conomon) genotypes. The J. Res. PJTSAU. 2014;42(3):62-66.

Khan MH, Bhuiyan SR, Saha KC, Bhuyin MR, Ali ASMY. Variability, correlation and path co-efficient analysis of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Bangladesh J. Agri. Res. 2015;40(4): 607-618.

Pasha SG, Marker S and Chandra GS. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis study on Snap melon (Cucumis melo L. var. momordica) farmer's varieties. Int. J. Bio-resour. Stress Manag. 2019;10(6):636-644.

Mamatha RM, Allolli TB, Chittapur RB, Gunnaiah R, Ganiger VM, Lokesh MS, Gopali JB. Character association study in the botanical groups of Cucumis melo. The Pharma Innov. J. 2023;12(9):1616-1619.

Rani R, Dogra BS, Singh SP, Kumari S, Sharma P. Variability and character association studies for yield and yield contributing characters in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) under low hills of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2023;93(7):801-805.

Afangideh U, Uyoh EA. Genetic variability and correlation studies in some varieties of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Jordan J. Agril. Sci. 2007;3(4):376-384.

Sharma S, Kumar R, Chatterjee S, Raj H. Correlation and path analysis studies for yield and its attributes in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2018;6(2):2045-2048.

Reddy BPK, Begum H, Sunil N, Reddy MT, Babu JD, Reddy RSK. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Suranaree J. Sci. Tech. 2013;20(2):135-149.

Ene CO, Ogbonna PE, Agbo CU, Chukwudi UP. Studies of phenotypic and genotypic variation in sixteen cucumber genotypes. Chilean J. Agril. Res. 2016;76(3):307-313.

Ahirwar CS, Singh DK, Kushwaha ML. Assessment of genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) germplasm on correlation, path analysis and cluster analysis. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett. 2017; 6(23):1886-1893.

Khedkar PD, Janeja HS, Delvadiya IR, Talekar N. (2022). Interrelationship among elite germplasm of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) at genotypic and phenotypic level. Eco. Env. and Cons. 2. 2023;S511-S516.

Muddarasu VR, Dubey RKR, Vikas S, Garima U, Barun S, Pandey AK, Singh JP. Variability, interrelationship and path analysis for yield improvement in snapmelon (Cucumis melo L. var momordica). Int. J. Basic App. Agril. Res. 2015;13:300- 308.