A Study on Fish Production of Different Size of Fish Farm Groups in Prayagraj District, Uttar Pradesh
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports,
Background: Uttar Pradesh is India’s most populous state having 1662 lakh population as per 2001 census, against 16.2% of India’s population with enough fisheries resources in the form of community ponds, tanks with dominance of rivers and man-made reservoirs. Five blocks (Koraon, Shankargarh, Karchhana, Handia, and Jasara) from Prayagraj were taken for study during the period of 1st December,2020 - 31st May,2021.
Aim: To examine the fish production of different size of fish farm groups.
Methodology: A study was conducted in the Prayagraj district of Uttar Pradesh. A total of 80 fish farmers were selected randomly from five blocks (Koraon, Shankargarh, Karchhana, Handia, and Jasara) and a pre-structured questionnaire was used to collect the data from the fish farmers. The fish farmers were classified into three categories on the basis of the size of pond area viz. small farmer: up to 0.125 ha., medium farmer: 0.125 ha to 0.250 ha., and large farmer: above 0.250 ha.
Result: The Study showed that, various independent variables of production like fingerlings, manures, feeds, and labor were being analysed in accordance with their respective sample of fish ponds and it is concluded that all of the independent variables affected the fish production differently. Using Cobb Douglas production function, 73% variation in gross value return from explanatory variables was observed in first size-group. Effect of Improved variety fingerlings was negative and coefficient of elasticity for human labor was positive but both impacted fish production significantly. A variation of 41.6% in gross value return was observed from second size group. Human labor impacted fish production significantly and its coefficient of elasticity was positive. Further, 45.7% of variation in gross value return was in third size group. Human labor and manure both had a significant effect, and their coefficients of elasticity was positive and negative respectively. Coefficient of multiple determination was 76.6% indicating variation in gross value return from independent variable from all farm’s situations. Pond area and human labor variables had positive coefficient of elasticity but for improved fingerlings it was negative and all effected fish production significantly.
Conclusion: It was concluded that there is a need to further engage the fish farmers in the fish production practices and provide them with sufficient inputs of production like fingerlings, manures, feeds, and labor so that the farmers can boost the fish production in the study area.
- Area of pond (ha.)
- expenses on fingerlings
- expenses on manuring
- expenses on feed
- fish production
- size groups of fish farms
How to Cite
National Fisheries Policies 2020 Report.
Maurya AK, Upadhyay AD, Khan S. Trend analysis of fish production in Uttar Pradesh, India. 2018;6(4): 180-184.
Goswami C, Zade VS. Statistical analysis of fish production in India. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2015;4(2):294-299.
Haryana Kisan Ayog, Hisar, Government of Haryana. Working Group Report on Fisheries Development.2012.
Islam MS, Jahan H, Abdullah Al-Amin AKM. Fisheries and aquaculture sectors in Bangladesh: an overview of the present status, challenges and future potential. Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Research. 2016;1(1):2-9.
Kumar GB, Datta KK, Joshi PK. Growth of fisheries and aquaculture sector in India: Needed policy directions for future. World Aquaculture. 2010;41(3):45-51.
Kummari S, Prakash B, Mamidala SP, Daggula N, Suresh G. Opportunities and prospects of inland freshwater aquaculture in Telangana: a step towards blue revolution. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2018;6(3):314-319.
Saini R. Jhajjar to have North India’s first ornamental fish hatchery. 2017.
Accessed 5 December 2017
Saravanan S. A study on production and export performance of fisheries sector in India. International Journal of Applied Research. 2015;1(13):71-73.
Sarin J. Fish farming a better proposition than growing wheat-paddy crops. The Weekend Leader.2017;8(22).
Singh DR, Vasisht AK, Kumar S. Profitability and technical efficiency of aquaculture in Punjab, India. Indian Journal of Fisheries.2015:62(2); 49-55.
Sree Vyshnavi PV, Venketa Rao P. Importance of marine fisheries in Indian economy. International Journal of Applied Science Engineering and Management. 2016;2(10): 68-83.
Abstract View: 436 times
PDF Download: 196 times