Methodological Strategy for the Conservation of Ecosystem Services
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports,
Page 14-27
DOI:
10.9734/jsrr/2022/v28i930544
Abstract
Ecosystem Services (ES) are the benefits that human beings receive from nature and that contribute to improving the quality of life. However, at present, precisely the human activities through which ES are used are generating negative impacts on ecosystems that hinder their provision. It is a vicious circle that needs to be corrected. To do so, this article, the result of postdoctoral research, proposes an ES sustainability strategy that includes a methodology to assess its status and generates actions to follow in order to contribute to the recovery and conservation of natural resources. The methodology implies identifying the ES of the place of interest, measuring a series of indicators constructed to be applied at home or in the community by the inhabitants of the territory, making an evaluation of them and, according to the results, actions to be followed are generated. In addition, an application is presented to Tocotá, a village in the municipality of Dagua in Valle del Cauca (Colombia) that is characterized by the visit of tourists attracted by the biodiversity of the place, but whose natural resources are being compromised by the activity that it has become the main economic resource of the community.The application of the methodological strategy indicates that the state of the ecosystem services in Tocotá is acceptable, although it is not in bad conditions, actions are suggested for its improvement. This methodological strategy allows identifying the state of ecosystem services in Tocotá, but it is replicable to hydrographic basins with similar conditions.
Keywords:
- Ecosystem services
- sustainability
- rural area
- Colombia
How to Cite
Marín, S. M. C., Tarquino, I. R., & Marín, D. F. C. (2022). Methodological Strategy for the Conservation of Ecosystem Services. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 28(9), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2022/v28i930544
References
EMS. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis (pdf file); 2005.
Available:http://www.milleniumassessment.org.
Available:https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
Valencia J, Rodriguez JM, Arias JJ, Castaño M. Assessment of ecosystem services for research and education as an input for decision-making from the perspective of risk management and climate change. Luna Azul Magazine. 2017;45:11-41.
DOI: 10.17151/luaz.2017.45.3.
EMS. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Synthesis report. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (pdf file); 2003.
Available: http://www.milleniumassessment.org.
Available: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.439.aspx.pdf.
National policy for the comprehensive management of biodiversity and its ecosystem services. Ministry of the Environment and sustainable development (PNGIBSE); 2014.
Available:https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Poli%CC%81tica-Nacional-de-Gestio%CC%81n-Integral-de-la-Biodiver.pdf.
TEEB; The economics of ecosystems and diversity: incorporating the economic aspects of nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions, and recommendations of the TEEB study; 2010.
Available:http://www.teebweb.org/wpcontent/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/Synthesis%20report_Spanish.pdf.
WWF; Environmental glossary: ecosystem services… what? 2018.
Available: http://www.wwf.org.co/?uNewsID=324210
CICES. Towards a Common Classification of Ecosystem Services; 2021.
Available: http://www.ciceseu. Available: https://cices.eu/.
Haines-Young R, Potschin MB; 2018. Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES). V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure.
Available:http://www.cices.eu.
Available: https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf.
National policy for the comprehensive management of biodiversity and its ecosystem services. Ministry of the Environment and sustainable development (PNGIBSE); 2014. Available:https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wpcontent/uploads/2021/10/Poli%CC%81tica-Nacional-de-Gestio%CC%81n-Integral-de-la-Biodiver.pdf.
Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z et al. Assessing nature’s contributions of people. Science. 2018;359(6373):270-2.
DOI: 10.1126/science.aap8826, PMID 29348221.
Gomez T. Approach to the state of knowledge of the social valuation of ecosystem services and community valuations of the El Llanito swamp as a case study; 2020. Graduate Work. Javeriana University. Digital file.
Available: https://repository.javeriana.edu.co/handle/10554/51678.
IPBES. Update on the classification of nature’s contributions to people by the Intergovernmental Science – policy Platform on biodiversity and Ecosystem Services; 2017.
Available: https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/pdf/ipbes-5-inf-24.pdf.
FAO. Ecosystem services and biodiversity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2018.
Available: http://www.fao.org.
Available: http://www.fao.org/ecosystem-services-biodiversity/es/.
EMS. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis (pdf file); 2005.
Available:http://www.milleniumassessment.org.
Available:https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
EMS. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis (pdf file); 2005.
Available:http://www.milleniumassessment.org.
Available:https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
Ministry of the Environment, Rural Development. National Program of Payments for Environmental Services; 2021.
Available:https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Programa-Nacional-de-Pagos-por-Servicios-Ambientales-2021-.pdf.
Álvarez CF, Álvarez E, Ajiaco RE, Buitrago L, Ortiz R, Gonzalez M et al. National assessment of biodiversity and ecosystem services (draft document); 2019.
Available:http://www.humboldt.org.co/images/pdf/RTD%20Final%20v290521%20Lanzamiento.pdf.
Bedoya MA, Cerón V, Contreras A, González A, González V, Puyana M et al. Chapter 3.
Available:http://www.humboldt.org.co/images/ipbesco/evaluacion/capitulo3.pdf. Nature’s contributions to people; 2020.
EMS. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis (pdf file); 2005.
Available:http://www.milleniumassessment.org.
Available:https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
Goat H. Evaluation of the ecosystem services of the Las Delicias stream located in the eastern hills of the city of Bogotá.
Available:https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12494/15077/1/2019-CabraSantos-Informe_ServiciosEcosistemicos%20%281%29.pdf ([Graduate thesis]. Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia); 2019.
Bernstein S. Rio+20: Sustainable Development in a Time of Multilateral Decline. Glob Environ Pol. 2013;13(4):12-21.
DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_e_00195.
Ecosystem services and biodiversity.
Available:http://www.fao.org.
Available:http://www.fao.org/ecosystem-services-biodiversity/es/.
Food and Agriculture Organization. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2018
Evaluation of the impact of Covid −19 on international tourism.
Available:https://www.unwto.org/es/assessment-of-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-international-tourism. UNWTO World Tourism Organization (UNWTO); 2022.
Kulczyk S, Woźniak E, Derek M. The role of the concept of ecosystem services in tourism studies. In: Lisocka-Jaegermann B, Piotrowska Z, Ząbecki K, editors.
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324543484_The_role_of_the_concept_of_ecosystem_services_in_tourism_studies, Socioeconomic and environmental vulnerability in the local and regional context (Ed.). Vol. 24. University of Warsaw. 2017;265-80.
Kulczyk S, Woźniak E, Derek M. The role of the concept of ecosystem services in tourism studies. In: Lisocka-Jaegermann B, Piotrowska Z, Ząbecki K, editors.
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324543484_The_role_of_the_concept_of_ecosystem_services_in_tourism_studies, Socioeconomic and environmental vulnerability in the local and regional context (Ed.). Vol. 25. University of Warsaw. 2017;265-80.
. Ecosystem services and biodiversity.
Available:http://www.fao.org.
Available:http://www.fao.org/ecosystem-services-biodiversity/es/.
Food and Agriculture Organization. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2018.
IDEAM. Atlas Ultraviolet Sol Radiat Ozone Colomb; 2021.
Municipal Mayor’s office of Dagua. J Dev Plan. 2020. Municipal:2020-3, "Let's all bet on growing for Dagua" 2020-2023.
Chee YE. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biol Conserv. 2004;120(4):549-65.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028.
Pandeya B, Buytaert W, Zulkafli Z, Karpouzoglou T, Mao F, Hannah DM. A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;22:250-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015.
Kremen C, Ostfeld RS. A Call to Ecologists: Measuring, Analyzing, and Managing Ecosystem Services. Front Ecol Environ. 2005;3(10):540-8.
DOI: 10.2307/3868610.
Balvanera P, Kremen C, Martínez-Ramos M. Applying community structure analysis to ecosystem function: examples from pollination and carbon storage. Ecol Appl. 2005;15(1):360-75.
DOI: 10.1890/03-5192.
Mulligan M, Burke S, Sanz-Cruz L, Van Soesbergen A. A review of methods and tools for modeling freshwater service flows (Report of conservation international). 2010;33.
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341736663_A_review_of_methods_and_tools_for_modelling_freshwater_service_flows_Citation_A_review_of_methods_and_tools_for_modelling_freshwater_service_flows_Report_to_Conservation_International.
Peh KS-H, Balmford A, Bradbury RB, Brown C, Butchart SHM, Hughes FMR et al. TESSA: A toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosyst Serv. 2013;5:51-7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.003.
Pandeya B, Buytaert W, Zulkafli Z, Karpouzoglou T, Mao F, Hannah DM. A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;22:250-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015.
Wang Z, Zhang B, Zhang S, Li X, Liu D, Song K et al. Changes of Land Use and of Ecosystem Service Values in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Environ Monit Assess. 2006;112(1-3):69- 91.
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-0312-5, PMID 16404535.
Malagó A, Bouraoui F, Vigiak O, Grizzetti B, Pastori M. Modeling water and nutrient fluxes in the Danube River Basin with SWAT. Sci Total Environ. 2017;603-604(604):196-218.
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.242, PMID 28628812.
Marino, R (Graduate thesis, University of Applied and Environmental Sciences); 2016. Characterization of ecosystem services for the design of agroforestry systems in the Upper Ranchería River Basin – Guajira Colombia.
Available: https://repository.udca.edu.co/handle/11158/546.
Paniagua M, Umbarila E, Reyes M, Cardona C. Modeling of hydrological ecosystem services and land use dynamics in the Mocoa River basin. Rev Colomb Amaz, 9. 2016;39:147-74.
Farley J. Ecosystem services: the economics debate. Ecosyst Serv. 2012;1(1):40-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.002.
Alkemade L, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen W, Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complexity. 2010;7(3):260-72.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
Machin M, Casas M. Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Perspective through different market approaches. Futures Magazine. 2006;IV(13):1-9.
Ruiz CA, Bello LC43. The Value Some Ecosyst Serv Colomb Andes?: benefit transfer by meta-analysis. 2014;19(3):301-22.
DOI: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC19-3.vase.
Taye FA, Folkersen MV, Fleming CM, Buckwell A, Mackey B, Diwakar KC et al. The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis. Ecol Econ. 2021;189:107145.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107145.
Balvanera P, Kremen C, Martínez-Ramos M. Applying community structure analysis to ecosystem function: examples from pollination and carbon storage. Ecol Appl. 2005;15(1):360-75.
DOI: 10.1890/03-5192.
Chopra K, Leemans P, Kumar H, Simons H. Ecosystems and human well-being: policy responses.
Available:https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7848;jsessionid=941F9C9494074C310F499E60A942EEC9. Washington: Island Press, D.C. 2005; 3.
Ministry of the Environment and Rural Development. National Program of Payments for Environmental Services; 2021.
Available:https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Programa-Nacional-de-Pagos-por-Servicios-Ambientales-2021-.pdf.
National Policy for the Comprehensive Management of Biodiversity and its Ecosystem Services. Ministry of the Environment and sustainable development (PNGIBSE); 2014.
Available:https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Poli%CC%81tica-Nacional-de-Gestio%CC%81n-Integral-de-la-Biodiver.pdf.
Alkemade L, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen W, Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complexity. 2010;7(3):260-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
Marino, R (Graduate thesis, University of Applied and Environmental Sciences). Characterization of ecosystem services for the design of agroforestry systems in the Upper Ranchería River Basin – Guajira Colombia; 2016.
Available: https://repository.udca.edu.co/handle/11158/546.
Pandeya B, Buytaert W, Zulkafli Z, Karpouzoglou T, Mao F, Hannah DM. A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;22:250-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015.
Lorca P, Soley R, Boyano D. Diagnosis, Identification and Economic Valuation of ecosystem services, municipalities of San Juan Nepomuceno and Santa Rosa de Cauca (pdf file). 2015;52.
Available:http://www.iucn.org.
Available:https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/content/documents/obj_6_valoracion_san_juan_nepomuceno.pdf.
CVC; Report on environmental public hearing management to follow up onthe2012-2015 Action Plan and 2013 accountability; 2014.
Available:https://cvc.gov.co/sites/default/files/2018-07/informe%20audiencias%20publicas%202013%20dar%20pacifico%20este.pdf.
Municipal Mayor’s office of Dagua. J Dev Plan. 2020. Municipal: 2020-3, "Let's all be ton growing for Dagua" 2020-2023.
Klinger W, Ramirez G, Lozano L, Valoyes Z. Comprehensive assessment of dry forests of Dagua. Valle del Cauca; 2012.
Available:https://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/handle/11349/24459/anexo2.pdf?sequence=3&isallowed=y.
Available:http://www.milleniumassessment.org.
Available:https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
Valencia J, Rodriguez JM, Arias JJ, Castaño M. Assessment of ecosystem services for research and education as an input for decision-making from the perspective of risk management and climate change. Luna Azul Magazine. 2017;45:11-41.
DOI: 10.17151/luaz.2017.45.3.
EMS. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Synthesis report. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (pdf file); 2003.
Available: http://www.milleniumassessment.org.
Available: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.439.aspx.pdf.
National policy for the comprehensive management of biodiversity and its ecosystem services. Ministry of the Environment and sustainable development (PNGIBSE); 2014.
Available:https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Poli%CC%81tica-Nacional-de-Gestio%CC%81n-Integral-de-la-Biodiver.pdf.
TEEB; The economics of ecosystems and diversity: incorporating the economic aspects of nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions, and recommendations of the TEEB study; 2010.
Available:http://www.teebweb.org/wpcontent/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/Synthesis%20report_Spanish.pdf.
WWF; Environmental glossary: ecosystem services… what? 2018.
Available: http://www.wwf.org.co/?uNewsID=324210
CICES. Towards a Common Classification of Ecosystem Services; 2021.
Available: http://www.ciceseu. Available: https://cices.eu/.
Haines-Young R, Potschin MB; 2018. Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES). V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure.
Available:http://www.cices.eu.
Available: https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf.
National policy for the comprehensive management of biodiversity and its ecosystem services. Ministry of the Environment and sustainable development (PNGIBSE); 2014. Available:https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wpcontent/uploads/2021/10/Poli%CC%81tica-Nacional-de-Gestio%CC%81n-Integral-de-la-Biodiver.pdf.
Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z et al. Assessing nature’s contributions of people. Science. 2018;359(6373):270-2.
DOI: 10.1126/science.aap8826, PMID 29348221.
Gomez T. Approach to the state of knowledge of the social valuation of ecosystem services and community valuations of the El Llanito swamp as a case study; 2020. Graduate Work. Javeriana University. Digital file.
Available: https://repository.javeriana.edu.co/handle/10554/51678.
IPBES. Update on the classification of nature’s contributions to people by the Intergovernmental Science – policy Platform on biodiversity and Ecosystem Services; 2017.
Available: https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/pdf/ipbes-5-inf-24.pdf.
FAO. Ecosystem services and biodiversity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2018.
Available: http://www.fao.org.
Available: http://www.fao.org/ecosystem-services-biodiversity/es/.
EMS. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis (pdf file); 2005.
Available:http://www.milleniumassessment.org.
Available:https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
EMS. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis (pdf file); 2005.
Available:http://www.milleniumassessment.org.
Available:https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
Ministry of the Environment, Rural Development. National Program of Payments for Environmental Services; 2021.
Available:https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Programa-Nacional-de-Pagos-por-Servicios-Ambientales-2021-.pdf.
Álvarez CF, Álvarez E, Ajiaco RE, Buitrago L, Ortiz R, Gonzalez M et al. National assessment of biodiversity and ecosystem services (draft document); 2019.
Available:http://www.humboldt.org.co/images/pdf/RTD%20Final%20v290521%20Lanzamiento.pdf.
Bedoya MA, Cerón V, Contreras A, González A, González V, Puyana M et al. Chapter 3.
Available:http://www.humboldt.org.co/images/ipbesco/evaluacion/capitulo3.pdf. Nature’s contributions to people; 2020.
EMS. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis (pdf file); 2005.
Available:http://www.milleniumassessment.org.
Available:https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
Goat H. Evaluation of the ecosystem services of the Las Delicias stream located in the eastern hills of the city of Bogotá.
Available:https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12494/15077/1/2019-CabraSantos-Informe_ServiciosEcosistemicos%20%281%29.pdf ([Graduate thesis]. Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia); 2019.
Bernstein S. Rio+20: Sustainable Development in a Time of Multilateral Decline. Glob Environ Pol. 2013;13(4):12-21.
DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_e_00195.
Ecosystem services and biodiversity.
Available:http://www.fao.org.
Available:http://www.fao.org/ecosystem-services-biodiversity/es/.
Food and Agriculture Organization. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2018
Evaluation of the impact of Covid −19 on international tourism.
Available:https://www.unwto.org/es/assessment-of-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-international-tourism. UNWTO World Tourism Organization (UNWTO); 2022.
Kulczyk S, Woźniak E, Derek M. The role of the concept of ecosystem services in tourism studies. In: Lisocka-Jaegermann B, Piotrowska Z, Ząbecki K, editors.
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324543484_The_role_of_the_concept_of_ecosystem_services_in_tourism_studies, Socioeconomic and environmental vulnerability in the local and regional context (Ed.). Vol. 24. University of Warsaw. 2017;265-80.
Kulczyk S, Woźniak E, Derek M. The role of the concept of ecosystem services in tourism studies. In: Lisocka-Jaegermann B, Piotrowska Z, Ząbecki K, editors.
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324543484_The_role_of_the_concept_of_ecosystem_services_in_tourism_studies, Socioeconomic and environmental vulnerability in the local and regional context (Ed.). Vol. 25. University of Warsaw. 2017;265-80.
. Ecosystem services and biodiversity.
Available:http://www.fao.org.
Available:http://www.fao.org/ecosystem-services-biodiversity/es/.
Food and Agriculture Organization. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2018.
IDEAM. Atlas Ultraviolet Sol Radiat Ozone Colomb; 2021.
Municipal Mayor’s office of Dagua. J Dev Plan. 2020. Municipal:2020-3, "Let's all bet on growing for Dagua" 2020-2023.
Chee YE. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biol Conserv. 2004;120(4):549-65.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028.
Pandeya B, Buytaert W, Zulkafli Z, Karpouzoglou T, Mao F, Hannah DM. A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;22:250-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015.
Kremen C, Ostfeld RS. A Call to Ecologists: Measuring, Analyzing, and Managing Ecosystem Services. Front Ecol Environ. 2005;3(10):540-8.
DOI: 10.2307/3868610.
Balvanera P, Kremen C, Martínez-Ramos M. Applying community structure analysis to ecosystem function: examples from pollination and carbon storage. Ecol Appl. 2005;15(1):360-75.
DOI: 10.1890/03-5192.
Mulligan M, Burke S, Sanz-Cruz L, Van Soesbergen A. A review of methods and tools for modeling freshwater service flows (Report of conservation international). 2010;33.
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341736663_A_review_of_methods_and_tools_for_modelling_freshwater_service_flows_Citation_A_review_of_methods_and_tools_for_modelling_freshwater_service_flows_Report_to_Conservation_International.
Peh KS-H, Balmford A, Bradbury RB, Brown C, Butchart SHM, Hughes FMR et al. TESSA: A toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosyst Serv. 2013;5:51-7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.003.
Pandeya B, Buytaert W, Zulkafli Z, Karpouzoglou T, Mao F, Hannah DM. A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;22:250-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015.
Wang Z, Zhang B, Zhang S, Li X, Liu D, Song K et al. Changes of Land Use and of Ecosystem Service Values in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Environ Monit Assess. 2006;112(1-3):69- 91.
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-0312-5, PMID 16404535.
Malagó A, Bouraoui F, Vigiak O, Grizzetti B, Pastori M. Modeling water and nutrient fluxes in the Danube River Basin with SWAT. Sci Total Environ. 2017;603-604(604):196-218.
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.242, PMID 28628812.
Marino, R (Graduate thesis, University of Applied and Environmental Sciences); 2016. Characterization of ecosystem services for the design of agroforestry systems in the Upper Ranchería River Basin – Guajira Colombia.
Available: https://repository.udca.edu.co/handle/11158/546.
Paniagua M, Umbarila E, Reyes M, Cardona C. Modeling of hydrological ecosystem services and land use dynamics in the Mocoa River basin. Rev Colomb Amaz, 9. 2016;39:147-74.
Farley J. Ecosystem services: the economics debate. Ecosyst Serv. 2012;1(1):40-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.002.
Alkemade L, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen W, Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complexity. 2010;7(3):260-72.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
Machin M, Casas M. Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Perspective through different market approaches. Futures Magazine. 2006;IV(13):1-9.
Ruiz CA, Bello LC43. The Value Some Ecosyst Serv Colomb Andes?: benefit transfer by meta-analysis. 2014;19(3):301-22.
DOI: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC19-3.vase.
Taye FA, Folkersen MV, Fleming CM, Buckwell A, Mackey B, Diwakar KC et al. The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis. Ecol Econ. 2021;189:107145.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107145.
Balvanera P, Kremen C, Martínez-Ramos M. Applying community structure analysis to ecosystem function: examples from pollination and carbon storage. Ecol Appl. 2005;15(1):360-75.
DOI: 10.1890/03-5192.
Chopra K, Leemans P, Kumar H, Simons H. Ecosystems and human well-being: policy responses.
Available:https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7848;jsessionid=941F9C9494074C310F499E60A942EEC9. Washington: Island Press, D.C. 2005; 3.
Ministry of the Environment and Rural Development. National Program of Payments for Environmental Services; 2021.
Available:https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Programa-Nacional-de-Pagos-por-Servicios-Ambientales-2021-.pdf.
National Policy for the Comprehensive Management of Biodiversity and its Ecosystem Services. Ministry of the Environment and sustainable development (PNGIBSE); 2014.
Available:https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Poli%CC%81tica-Nacional-de-Gestio%CC%81n-Integral-de-la-Biodiver.pdf.
Alkemade L, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen W, Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complexity. 2010;7(3):260-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
Marino, R (Graduate thesis, University of Applied and Environmental Sciences). Characterization of ecosystem services for the design of agroforestry systems in the Upper Ranchería River Basin – Guajira Colombia; 2016.
Available: https://repository.udca.edu.co/handle/11158/546.
Pandeya B, Buytaert W, Zulkafli Z, Karpouzoglou T, Mao F, Hannah DM. A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;22:250-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015.
Lorca P, Soley R, Boyano D. Diagnosis, Identification and Economic Valuation of ecosystem services, municipalities of San Juan Nepomuceno and Santa Rosa de Cauca (pdf file). 2015;52.
Available:http://www.iucn.org.
Available:https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/content/documents/obj_6_valoracion_san_juan_nepomuceno.pdf.
CVC; Report on environmental public hearing management to follow up onthe2012-2015 Action Plan and 2013 accountability; 2014.
Available:https://cvc.gov.co/sites/default/files/2018-07/informe%20audiencias%20publicas%202013%20dar%20pacifico%20este.pdf.
Municipal Mayor’s office of Dagua. J Dev Plan. 2020. Municipal: 2020-3, "Let's all be ton growing for Dagua" 2020-2023.
Klinger W, Ramirez G, Lozano L, Valoyes Z. Comprehensive assessment of dry forests of Dagua. Valle del Cauca; 2012.
Available:https://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/handle/11349/24459/anexo2.pdf?sequence=3&isallowed=y.
-
Abstract View: 63 times
PDF Download: 28 times
