Journal of Scientific Research and Reports

Severe slugging involves large magnitude fluctuations in pressure and flow rate in a riser due to low gas flow rates and low Gas-liquid ratio (GLR). This work evaluates two mitigation concepts: topside choking and riser base gas lift to determine which technique is more desirable.

A base case model was created to understand the nature of slugging with an input mass flowrate of 15kg/s, separator operating at 22.5Bar and 37⁰C. After 8hours of simulation, the presence of a severe slug was observed at the production riser. Two models were created from the base case to mitigate the severe slugging. An introduction of topside choke to eliminate or reduce the riser slugging, likewise deployment of Riser base gas lift (RBGL) to achieve the same purpose.

The result indicated that with the introduction of the topside choke and reducing the opening percentages of the choke from 80% to 5% stepwise, the slugging amplitudes were greatly reduced from 3.3bar to 0.3bar. Though this led to back pressure and a reduction in production. A 50% choke opening was suggested as the optimal choke opening for the simulated case. Results from the introduction of dehydrated gas with a mass flow rate of 1.2kg/s at the riser base indicated slug elimination from the riser and flowline. The results of this simulation were observed at the end of the riser (inlet to the separator) after about 8hours 20mins

This report identifies that of the two simulated techniques (topside choking and RBGL), RBGL is more efficient in addressing slug issues without impacting field production.