Household Baseline Survey on Indigenous Chicken Production Characteristics and Constraints in Busia and Machakos Counties of Kenya
C. I. Muleke *
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Microbiology and Parasitology, Egerton University, P.O.Box 563-20115, Egerton, Kenya.
I. Ogali
Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization, Veterinary Science Research Institute, Muguga, P.O.Box 32- 00902, Kikuyu, Kenya.
P. Amanya
Department of Agricultural Economics, Egerton University, P.O.Box 563-20115, Egerton, Kenya.
E. O. Mungube
Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization, Veterinary Science Research Institute, Muguga, P.O.Box 32- 00902, Kikuyu, Kenya.
O. B. Bebe
Department of Animal Sciences, Egerton University, P.O.Box 563-20115, Egerton, Kenya.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aims: To collect preliminary baseline data prior to validation of three climate-smart technologies.
Study Design: A structured questionnaire was employed with participation of actors along the Indigenous Chicken value chain.
Place and Duration of Study: Study was conducted from May 2019 to June 2020 within four (4) Sub-Counties in Busia and Machakos where high Indigenous Chicken populations are found.
Methodology: A total of 160 households were surveyed. Targeted household information was recorded viz: distribution of respondents by village in the Counties; farmer socio-economic factors; flock structure and characteristics; disease and parasite constraints, management practices; disease reporting and communication amongst recruited farmers.
Results: Results revealed that 56.5% of the respondents were male and 43.5% were female wit mean age of 50 years. Most farmers had formal education (97%) and practiced semi extensive poultry farming system (59%). Both indigenous and exotic chicken (62%) were kept for income purposes (82.6%) and only young chicks received feed supplements (55.8%). Newcastle (18.5%) and coccidiosis (16.4%) comprised the two major disease constraints reported. Prevalent bird disease symptoms were diarrhea (24.9%) and coughing (23.1%) while mites (27.9%) and fleas (22.3%) dominated the ecto-parasites. Disease control strategies comprised: vaccines (72.8%), dewormers (44.9%) and ethno-veterinary medicine. Aloe secundiflora and Aloe feroxin, were singled out as locally available and effective means of treating diarrhea (62.9%), respiratory infections (61.9%) and worm control (64.5%). Most Indigenous Chicken farmers (76.8%) failed to report illnesses among their flock and did not access to health services (72.1%). Farmers accessed health information through radio (26.5%) as opposed to mobile phones (1.65%).
Conclusion: Findings of this survey reveal a low-grade free-range poultry system characterized by poor disease control. This scenario calls for targeted efforts by both government and private stakeholders to improve Indigenous Chicken management and help farmers adopt alternative climatic smart disease control interventions.
Keywords: Baseline survey, indigenous chicken, production characteristics, constraints, Busia; Machakos