Journal of Scientific Research and Reports

Setting out of building footings are usually carried out using profile board. This method is usually not accurate in locating the position of columns. Hence, columns that are designed as a concentric columns to their respective footings ends up being columns having eccentricities to the pad footings that supports them. Since the stress distribution under pad footing with concentric column is different from that of pad footing with eccentric column, there is need to study the effect of these eccentricity on the load carrying capacity of the pad footing. In carrying out this work, four pad footings and a typical foundation were used. The pad footings were of sizes 230 mm x 230 mm x 150 mm, with columns of 150 mm x 150 mm cross-section. The first pad footing P_1SH was pad footing with short column and zero eccentricity, the second pad footing P_2SL was pad footing with slender column and zero eccentricity, the third pad footing P_3SL was footing with slender column with 40 mm eccentricity, while the forth pad footing P_4SL was footing with slender column with 80 mm eccentricity. The foundation comprises of sand which was contained in a sandbox. The sandbox was made of steel plate of dimensions 0.3 m × 0.3 m × 0.2 m of 4 mm thickness, was used to provide support for the foundation. The foundation was produced by compacting loose sand in three layers with 20 blows per layer in the steel box and with density of about 735 kg/m³. The pad footings were placed on top of the foundation contained in the sandbox, and together were placed on the loading plate of Universal Testing Machine (UTM). Compressive load was applied on each of the pad footings through the columns till failure occurred, using UTM. It was found out that pad footing P_1SH have the highest load capacity of 261.25 kN, P_2SL pad footing with load capacity of 124.24 kN, P_3SL pad footing with load capacity of 39.34 kN, while P_4SL pad footing with load capacity of 23.30 kN.