Financial Viability in Sugarcane Farming in Karnataka, India: A Comparative Study of Natural and Conventional Farming Approaches

Aishwarya. S. P *

Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

Mahantesh R. Nayak

Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad 580 005, Karnataka, India.

B. R. Jamakhandi

Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad 580 005, Karnataka, India.

Chadana B.M

Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

Sushma Purada

Department of Agribusiness Management, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad 580 005, Karnataka, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

This study evaluates the economic viability of natural farming practices, specifically Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF), compared to conventional methods in sugarcane cultivation in the Belagavi district of Karnataka during the year 2023-24. Natural farming emphasizes minimal monetary investment in inputs, promoting self-reliance among farmers and enhancing soil health and sustainability. A total of 120 farmers were surveyed, with 60 farmers practicing natural farming and 60 conventional farming methods. The research utilized cost and return analysis alongside a partial budgeting technique to assess financial outcomes like reduced costs and added return’s structure. Findings reveal that, while conventional farming yields higher outputs 150.73 t/ha, natural farming proves to be a more sustainable and economically favourable alternative, with lower cost of cultivation of Rs. 2,24,544.71 per hectare compared to Rs. 2,55,587.89 of conventional farming. Natural farming's better net returns amount to Rs. 2,07,633 per hectare, surpassing conventional farming's Rs. 1,81,532. Additionally, the net gain by adopting natural farming practices was calculated to Rs. 28,603.99, showcasing its financial advantage. Moreover, natural farming commands a higher price per tonne of sugarcane than the conventional farming (Rs. 3,300 vs. Rs. 2,900), reflecting the growing market demand for naturally grown products. The study underscores the importance of promoting sustainable agricultural practices and implementing supportive policies, such as developing training programs for farmers and simplifying the certification process. These initiatives can further encourage the adoption of natural farming techniques, highlighting their potential to improve both economic viability and ecological health in agriculture. Overall, natural farming emerges as a viable alternative for sustainable sugarcane cultivation.

Keywords: Financial viability, net gain, natural farming, partial budgeting


How to Cite

S. P, Aishwarya., Mahantesh R. Nayak, B. R. Jamakhandi, Chadana B.M, and Sushma Purada. 2025. “Financial Viability in Sugarcane Farming in Karnataka, India: A Comparative Study of Natural and Conventional Farming Approaches”. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports 31 (3):243-51. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i32897.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.