Economic and Social Transformation: Self-help Groups as Catalysts for Women’s Empowerment in Rural India
Somdutt Tripathi
Department of Agricultural Extension, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, UP, India.
B. P. Mishra *
Department of Agricultural Extension, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, UP, India.
B.K. Gupta
Department of Agricultural Extension, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, UP, India.
A. P. Verma
Department of Agricultural Extension, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, UP, India.
Jaideep K. Singh
Animal Husbandry, Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
Diksha Patel
Agriculture Extension, KVK Banda, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, UP, India.
Supriya
Department of Agricultural Economics, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya, India.
Anjali Pandey
Department of Agricultural Extension, Sardar Vallabhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, UP, India.
Prateek Kumar
Department of Agricultural Extension, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology Kumarganj, Ayodhya, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Background: Women’s self-help groups (SHGs) in rural India have grown into one of the largest community-based development architectures in the world, bringing together millions of low-income women around savings, credit and mutual support. Initially promoted as an instrument for microfinance and financial inclusion, these groups have gradually evolved into multi-functional platforms where economic initiatives, social mobilization and state-led welfare programs intersect.
Aim: This review critically examines how SHGs operate as catalysts for women’s empowerment and broader economic and social transformation in rural India. It synthesizes recent empirical evidence on the ways in which SHG participation shapes women’s access to financial services, income generation, entrepreneurship and livelihood diversification, as well as their decision-making power, mobility, political voice, self-confidence and collective agency.
Method and Results: The analysis highlights that SHGs tend to strengthen women’s economic security by expanding access to affordable credit, encouraging regular savings and reducing dependence on informal moneylenders, while also creating pathways into micro-enterprise and producer collectives. At the same time, regular group meetings, peer learning and federated structures help build social capital and leadership skills, providing women with new channels to engage local governance systems and public institutions. However, the review also underscores that positive outcomes are uneven and strongly conditioned by program design, quality of facilitation, local power relations and broader livelihood opportunities. Challenges such as elite capture, exclusion of the poorest, increased work burdens and the risk of over-indebtedness temper the more optimistic narratives.
Conclusion: The article argues that SHGs can be powerful levers of women-led development in rural India when they are inclusive, adequately supported and embedded in enabling institutional ecosystems, and when empowerment is pursued as a multidimensional and long-term process rather than a narrow financial outcome.
Keywords: Self-help groups, women’s empowerment, rural India, microfinance, social capital, collective action, livelihoods