Factors Influencing the Success of FPO: A Case Study on Atmakur (S) Farmers Producers Organization in Suryapet District of Telangana, India
Gurrala Priyanka *
Department of Agricultural Extension Education, PJTAU, India.
Korabandi Suhasini
Agricultural College, Palem, PJTAU, India.
V. Ravinder Naik
Agricultural College Warangal, India.
Pandhiri Kruparani
Department of Agricultural Extension Education, PJTAU, India.
Nazreenbanu Tahasildar
Department of Agricultural Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This study examines service domains associated with the perceived performance of a Farmer Producer Organization (FPO) through a case study of Atmakur (S) Farmers Producer Organization in Suryapet district, Telangana. An ex-post facto research design was employed. Primary data were collected from 120 member farmers using a structured interview schedule, and organizational information was compiled from FPO records alongside the NABARD Performance Grading Tool. Members assessed the availability and functioning of five service domains—technical advisory support, input supply, marketing facilitation, networking/linkages, and financial services. Garrett ranking was applied to prioritize domains according to members’ perceived influence on overall FPO performance. Technical services received the highest priority (Garrett score: 75.50), followed by input supply services (71.90), indicating that agronomic guidance and timely access to quality inputs are central to members’ evaluation of organizational effectiveness. Marketing-related services ranked next, reflecting the continuing importance of collective aggregation and price realization. Networking and financial services were ranked comparatively lower, suggesting weaker perceived outreach, partnership formation, and access to credit/financial facilitation. Respondents highlighted operational practices such as localized input distribution (including delivery arrangements) as improving convenience and uptake. Overall, the results indicate that the FPO’s current strengths lie in member-facing advisory and input delivery functions, while service gaps persist in external linkage building and financial intermediation. Strengthening collaborations with market actors, banks, and support agencies, along with improving the design and communication of financial products, may enhance the FPO’s service portfolio and member benefits. Findings are case-specific but offer practical cues for similar emerging FPOs.
Keywords: Marginal farmers, technical services and collectives, farmer producer organization, garrett ranking