Economics of Wheat Production and Marketing in Vidisha District of Madhya Pradesh
Hitanshu Sahu *
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture Indore, RVSKVV, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ankita Sahu
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture Indore, RVSKVV, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Neha Dwivedi
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture Indore, RVSKVV, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Aditya Singh
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture Indore, RVSKVV, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Aradhana Singh Rajpoot
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, JNKVV, Jabalpur (M.P.), India.
Sudhir Singh
Department of Agricultural Economics, R.A.K. College of Agriculture, Sehore, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (RVSKVV), Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aim: To describe the production costs, returns and wheat marketing channels reported for small, medium and large farm households in Vidisha district, Madhya Pradesh.
Design and Setting: A cross-sectional farm survey covered 90 wheat growers (30 in each farm-size category) in five villages in the Vidisha and Basoda blocks during the 2024–2025 agricultural year.
Methods: Per-hectare expense components for each farm-size group were aggregated using standard agricultural cost identities, with an operational 10% charge for farm management. Group-level gross revenue and grain yields were summarized with equal weights across the three-sampled farm-size groups. Producer share, price spread and two marketing-efficiency ratios were calculated from per-quintal channel prices, costs and margins.
Results: The respondent-balanced mean wheat yield was 49.95 q/ha, and mean gross revenue was ₹140,556.92/ha. The corresponding Cost C3, net return over C3 and gross-return-to-cost ratio were ₹70,254.70/ha, ₹70,302.22/ha and 2.00, respectively. The direct producer–consumer channel had the highest producer share (96.40%) and the highest Acharya efficiency ratio (26.76); a multi-stage channel involving a processor had the lowest corresponding values (76.07% and 3.18).
Conclusion: The descriptive accounting indicates positive wheat-production returns across farm-size groups and comparatively lower recorded marketing costs in the direct channel. These findings are specific to the sampled farmers and channel valuations; differences among marketing channels cannot be interpreted causally without product-stage and transaction-level comparability.
Keywords: Wheat, production economics, cost of cultivation, gross margin, producer share, marketing efficiency, Vidisha