Journal of Scientific Research and Reports

Digital finance promises to lower the costs of financial transactions, expand rural savings and credit, and improve the timing of agricultural investment. Yet access to an account is not equivalent to access to suitable finance, and the movement from digital transactions to farm productivity is neither automatic nor uniform. This critical narrative review examines peer-reviewed evidence on mobile money, digital savings, algorithmic credit, payment digitisation, and their relationships with smallholder investment, risk management and livelihoods. Evidence from randomised trials, panel studies, observational farm surveys, qualitative research and recent reviews is compared with attention to causal identification, agricultural seasonality, inclusion and consumer protection. The strongest findings concern reduced transfer frictions and improved opportunities for remittance-based consumption smoothing. More conditional evidence links mobile payments and savings to specific productive inputs; incentives and the timing of liquidity often determine whether financial access changes investment. Recent experimental work on agricultural digital credit shows greater input spending without reliably demonstrated improvements in harvest output or profits. Consumer risks, including data misuse, opaque pricing and adverse credit reporting, complicate welfare assessments. The review argues that agricultural digital finance should be appraised as an interconnected system of payments, liquidity, insurance, market relationships and safeguards rather than as an isolated application or financial inclusion metric. Research priorities include seasonally timed randomised evaluations, long-term farm profitability, distributional effects, interoperable value-chain payments and transparent risk-adjusted consumer outcomes. Digital finance may relax consequential frictions, but durable agricultural benefits depend on product design, institutions and the broader production environment.